Infill stiffness demo test collection from TPU
We calculate the final price from your selected file. You review and accept it before payment.
Saved on this device.
Infill stiffness demo test collection from TPU
- Rating
- 4.875 / 5
- Likes
- 432
- Downloads
- 1,752
- Makes
- 8
- Views
- 13,767
- Reviews
- 8
Updated at source:
Model information
- Source
- Printables
- Category
- Test Models
- License
- Creative Commons — Attribution
I think print infills are for most of us a bit mysterious. We all have a favourite, which we think is better, faster, stronger, than the others, but it’s mostly based on our instincts. No real facts, mostly just feelings.
I wanted to see, know and prove, which is the best! So I went for a new kind of infill project, that I haven’t seen yet. Here is it:
- took a spool of eSun 95A TPU
- prepared 16 cubes sized 30x30x30mm
- no perimeters, no top layers
- only 2 bottom layers (max 0,4mm total)
- allocated all Prusaslicer infills to one cube with 15% infill
And I think the results are impressive.
The two stiffest ones are cubic and gyroid, but cubic is stiffer and much faster! Printing the same size of infill takes 50% longer with gyroid (have a look at the attached chart).
The conclusion:
- Cubic is the stiffest one! And as it is very filament efficient and quite quick, this is my new favourite!
- if you look for filament efficient option, go for adaptive cubic. It’s still quite strong, but very quick and efficient!
I hope it helps you all! 